Case C-15/16, Baumeister – seeking access to documents held by financial services authorities [judgment 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:464]
By judgment of 19 June 2018 (ECLI:EU:C:2018:464) the Court ruled, in the words of the operative part: “1.
Tag
confounded
3 case reports
Case C-31/16, Visser Vastgoed – planning on EU services law and not a purely internal situation
Can a policy maker ever resist the application of EU law? Yes, perhaps, if there is a ‘purely internal situation’. It is EU law that in such a situation, EU law will not apply. Dutch authorities are adept at exploiting this ‘loophole’. A couple of years ago, Amsterdam’s council invoked it when…
Case C-160/15, GS Media – Porn! Hyperlinked and Hyperleaked! [judgment 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:644]
On 8 September 2016 the Court ruled (ECLI:EU:C:2016:644) that posting a hyperlink to works published online without the rightholder's consent is a communication to the public where the poster knew or ought to have known of the illegality.